Competitor profile

AGAM ENTERPRISES

They win 45% of what they bid, but only 14% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

29tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
15 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
29
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹42.1 L
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 13.6% conversion
Win rate
44.8%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count29 bids
44.8%
48.3%
Awarded1344.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected26.9%
Lost1448.3%
By value₹3.1 Cr
13.6%
77.5%
Awarded₹42.1 L13.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.4 Cr77.5%
Lost₹27.7 L8.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹42.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MOHAN LAL5 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
02
SANDEEP KUMAR0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MOHAN LAL CONTRACTOR3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹6.6 L
won head-to-head
04
GURDIAL SINGH CONTRACTOR0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MANPREET CONTRACTOR1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Shri Krishna Enterprises2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹4.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAGAM ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About AGAM ENTERPRISES

AGAM ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 44.8% win rate — worth ₹42.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Animal Husbandry, at 68.2% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MOHAN LAL, SANDEEP KUMAR and MOHAN LAL CONTRACTOR. MOHAN LAL bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; AGAM ENTERPRISES won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.