Competitor profile

Aesthetic Landscaping

They win 13% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

8tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4
of ₹5.9 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
12.5%
37.5%
50.0%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected337.5%
Lost450.0%
By value₹5.9 Cr
46.2%
53.8%
Awarded₹40.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.7 Cr46.2%
Lost₹3.2 Cr53.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Nisargland Scape Pvt Ltd1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
02
Sheetal Landscape and Agro Services3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Omkar Enterprises1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
04
KWALITY SEEDS AND NURSERY1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3
won head-to-head
05
Anand Garden0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAesthetic Landscaping awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Aesthetic Landscaping

About Aesthetic Landscaping

Aesthetic Landscaping appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹4 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Vasai Virar City Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Nisargland Scape Pvt Ltd, Sheetal Landscape and Agro Services and Omkar Enterprises. Nisargland Scape Pvt Ltd bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Aesthetic Landscaping won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.