Competitor profile

Adib Construction

They win 74% of what they bid, but only 46% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

19tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
11 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
19
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.3 Cr
of ₹7.1 Cr bid — 46.4% conversion
Win rate
73.7%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count19 bids
73.7%
26.3%
Awarded1473.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost526.3%
By value₹7.1 Cr
46.4%
53.6%
Awarded₹3.3 Cr46.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.8 Cr53.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹3.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M GAZI INFRA LLP0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
GLOBAL ENTERPRISES0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
happy construction2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Akash Construction Company3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Dharam Construction Co0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Vighnahar Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAdib Construction awardedOthers

About Adib Construction

Adib Construction appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 73.7% win rate — worth ₹3.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, at 79.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M GAZI INFRA LLP, GLOBAL ENTERPRISES and happy construction. M GAZI INFRA LLP bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Adib Construction won 14.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.