Competitor profile

M/S ABDUL HAMEED PASWAL

They win 25% of what they bid — and 36% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Jul 2023last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.8 L
of ₹16.2 L bid — 35.9% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹16.2 L
35.9%
58.5%
Awarded₹5.8 L35.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹90,0005.6%
Lost₹9.5 L58.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S MOHAMMAD LATEEF KHATANA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.2 L
won head-to-head
02
GHULAM NABI RATHER0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
BASHIR AHMAD RAINA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.4 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Gulam Mustafa Kasana0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MR. JAHANGIR AHMAD BHAT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
WAHEEDA TABASUM0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedABDUL HAMEED awardedOthers

About M/S ABDUL HAMEED PASWAL

M/S ABDUL HAMEED PASWAL appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹5.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Jul 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Shri Amarnathji Shrine Board, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 24.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S MOHAMMAD LATEEF KHATANA, GHULAM NABI RATHER and BASHIR AHMAD RAINA. M/S MOHAMMAD LATEEF KHATANA bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S ABDUL HAMEED PASWAL won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.