Competitor profile

M/S MOHAMMAD LATEEF KHATANA

They win 29% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.4 L
of ₹37.8 L bid — 27.6% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
28.6%
71.4%
Awarded428.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1071.4%
By value₹37.8 L
27.6%
72.4%
Awarded₹10.4 L27.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹27.3 L72.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ARSHAD AHMAD MALIK0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
JALIL AHMAD SONTRA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹68,940
won head-to-head
03
JAVAID AHMAD KHATANA3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹7.2 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S AB RASHID LONE1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.4 L
won head-to-head
05
MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL JARAH0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MR. JAHANGIR AHMAD BHAT0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMOHAMMAD LATEEF awardedOthers

About M/S MOHAMMAD LATEEF KHATANA

M/S MOHAMMAD LATEEF KHATANA appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹10.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Shri Amarnathji Shrine Board, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ARSHAD AHMAD MALIK, JALIL AHMAD SONTRA and JAVAID AHMAD KHATANA. ARSHAD AHMAD MALIK bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S MOHAMMAD LATEEF KHATANA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.