Competitor profile

A.M.Kaloti

They win 13% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

45tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
31 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
45
45 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
33 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.9 L
of ₹14.9 Cr bid — 6.0% conversion
Win rate
13.3%
of 45 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count45 bids
13.3%
13.3%
73.3%
Awarded613.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected613.3%
Lost3373.3%
By value₹14.9 Cr
54.2%
39.8%
Awarded₹89.9 L6.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.1 Cr54.2%
Lost₹5.9 Cr39.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹89.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RUPESH LILADHAR RANDIVE3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹4
won head-to-head
02
NARESH SAHADEO SHENWAR1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
03
PAYAL SHRIKANT GHATE2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
04
B.P.UKEY0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
prashant t maddiwar1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹29.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Mahesh Gadewar6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹10
won head-to-head
Rival awardedA.M.Kaloti awardedOthers

About A.M.Kaloti

A.M.Kaloti appears as a bidder on 45 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 45 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 13.3% win rate — worth ₹89.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 65.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RUPESH LILADHAR RANDIVE, NARESH SAHADEO SHENWAR and PAYAL SHRIKANT GHATE. RUPESH LILADHAR RANDIVE bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; A.M.Kaloti won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.