Competitor profile

M/S A K HOSPITALITY SERVICES

They win 18% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
26 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
11
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹36.1 L
of ₹3.4 Cr bid — 10.5% conversion
Win rate
18.2%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
18.2%
72.7%
Awarded218.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost872.7%
By value₹3.4 Cr
10.5%
85.0%
Awarded₹36.1 L10.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹15.4 L4.5%
Lost₹2.9 Cr85.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

HPSEBL₹4.8 L13.2%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Mohan Lal0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RAHUL THAKUR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹8.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Saddam Engineering0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
V S CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AJAY THAKUR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Kuldeep Singh0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedA K HOSPITALITY awardedOthers

About M/S A K HOSPITALITY SERVICES

M/S A K HOSPITALITY SERVICES appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 18.2% win rate — worth ₹36.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Himachal Pradesh Agriculture Development Society (JICA-ODA loan), at 86.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Mohan Lal, RAHUL THAKUR and Saddam Engineering. Mohan Lal bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S A K HOSPITALITY SERVICES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.