Competitor profile

M.S.A. CONSTRUCTION

They win 45% of what they bid, and 44% of the value they chase.

50tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
15 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
49
50 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
22
27 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.6 Cr
of ₹5.9 Cr bid — 43.9% conversion
Win rate
44.9%
of 49 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count49 bids
44.9%
55.1%
Awarded2244.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2755.1%
By value₹5.9 Cr
43.8%
56.2%
Awarded₹2.6 Cr43.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.3 Cr56.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Premchandrachumal1 win · 25 shared tenders
₹5.9 L
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s S.K GURBAXANI7 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹90.1 L
won head-to-head
04
AREMS BY SMERA MEHTA0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s L.c Gurbaxani2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹24.6 L
won head-to-head
06
Amruta Construction0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.S.A. CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M.S.A. CONSTRUCTION

M.S.A. CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 50 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 49 decided bids, it was awarded 22 — a 44.9% win rate — worth ₹2.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Premchandrachumal, M/s S G LULLA (PROP. SHRI BHARAT SUGNOMAL LULLA) and M/s S.K GURBAXANI. M/s Premchandrachumal bid on 25 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M.S.A. CONSTRUCTION won 12.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.