Competitor profile

YA-SAN(INDIA)

They win 67% of what they bid, but only 13% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 L
of ₹30.1 L bid — 13.0% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost00.0%
By value₹30.1 L
13.0%
87.0%
Awarded₹3.9 L13.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹26.2 L87.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RATTAN SALES CORPORATION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹8.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Adarsh Enterprises1 win · 1 shared tender
₹8.8 L
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
V.K.Traders1 win · 1 shared tender
₹9.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Shri Balaji Technologies0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedYA-SAN(INDIA) awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to YA-SAN(INDIA)

About YA-SAN(INDIA)

YA-SAN(INDIA) appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹3.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, at 99.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Scientific Systems and Chemicals Private Limited, RATTAN SALES CORPORATION and Adarsh Enterprises. Scientific Systems and Chemicals Private Limited bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; YA-SAN(INDIA) won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.