Competitor profile

VRAT ENTERPRISES

They win 20% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
4 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹21.8 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 14.4% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost480.0%
By value₹1.5 Cr
14.4%
85.6%
Awarded₹21.8 L14.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.3 Cr85.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NITYA ASSOCIATES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHRI HERAMB CONSTRACTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MOHAN SINGH CHOUHAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
HARDIKA CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Mazid Khan0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BLITHE CONSTRUCTION LLP1 win · 1 shared tender
₹52.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVRAT ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to VRAT ENTERPRISES

About VRAT ENTERPRISES

VRAT ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹21.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP Police Housing and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NITYA ASSOCIATES, SHRI HERAMB CONSTRACTION and MOHAN SINGH CHOUHAN. NITYA ASSOCIATES bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; VRAT ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.