Competitor profile

viraj construction

They win 35% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹3.0 Cr bid — 34.9% conversion
Win rate
35.3%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
35.3%
58.8%
Awarded635.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.9%
Lost1058.8%
By value₹3.0 Cr
34.9%
62.7%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr34.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.2 L2.3%
Lost₹1.9 Cr62.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MAA GAYATRI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
VANDNA ENTERPRISES AND SAMOOH0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
kiran associate0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SNK GROUP OF CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹5.0 L
won head-to-head
05
shiv kripa traders0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Balaji Buildicon0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedviraj construction awardedOthers

About viraj construction

viraj construction appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 35.3% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP Police Housing and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd, at 56.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 16.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MAA GAYATRI CONSTRUCTION, VANDNA ENTERPRISES AND SAMOOH and kiran associate. MAA GAYATRI CONSTRUCTION bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; viraj construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.