Competitor profile

M/S VINOD KUMAR

They win 22% of what they bid, and 20% of the value they chase.

88tenders on record
10buyer authorities
0states
11 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
86
88 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
19
59 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.1 Cr
of ₹20.6 Cr bid — 20.0% conversion
Win rate
22.1%
of 86 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count86 bids
22.1%
68.6%
Awarded1922.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected89.3%
Lost5968.6%
By value₹20.6 Cr
20.0%
75.3%
Awarded₹4.1 Cr20.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹95.3 L4.6%
Lost₹15.5 Cr75.3%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

19 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
UMA CONSTRUCTION17 wins · 58 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Neeraj Kumar Pandey11 wins · 57 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Pradeep Kumar Shukla9 wins · 54 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S AASHIRWAD CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹84.9 L
won head-to-head
05
arcoma3 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹28.1 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S Raj Construction0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVINOD KUMAR awardedOthers

About M/S VINOD KUMAR

M/S VINOD KUMAR appears as a bidder on 88 government tenders on record, from 10 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 86 decided bids, it was awarded 19 — a 22.1% win rate — worth ₹4.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Archaeological Survey of India, at 59.1% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against UMA CONSTRUCTION, Neeraj Kumar Pandey and Pradeep Kumar Shukla. UMA CONSTRUCTION bid on 58 of the same tenders and won 17 of them; M/S VINOD KUMAR won 11.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.