Competitor profile

VIKESH KUMAR

They win 19% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

36tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
27
36 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹52.6 Cr
of ₹329.5 Cr bid — 16.0% conversion
Win rate
18.5%
of 27 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count27 bids
18.5%
14.8%
66.7%
Awarded518.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected414.8%
Lost1866.7%
By value₹329.5 Cr
16.0%
19.6%
64.5%
Awarded₹52.6 Cr16.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹64.5 Cr19.6%
Lost₹212.4 Cr64.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RATTAN CHAND AND SONS0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
B AND L PROJECT CONSTRUCTIONS PVT.LTD.0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S R K Gupta and Co0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KATYAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s ZARGAR CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹12.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Bhan Construction Group0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVIKESH KUMAR awardedOthers

About VIKESH KUMAR

VIKESH KUMAR appears as a bidder on 36 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 27 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 18.5% win rate — worth ₹52.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RATTAN CHAND AND SONS, B AND L PROJECT CONSTRUCTIONS PVT.LTD. and M/S R K Gupta and Co. RATTAN CHAND AND SONS bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; VIKESH KUMAR won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.