Competitor profile

vibrant construction

They win 29% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.8 L
of ₹50.0 L bid — 29.7% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
28.6%
14.3%
57.1%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost457.1%
By value₹50.0 L
29.7%
61.3%
Awarded₹14.8 L29.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.5 L9.0%
Lost₹30.7 L61.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAJENDRA GUPTA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
GURUKRIPA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHASTRI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
04
AKSHAY JOSHI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Priyanka Enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHYAMLAL PATIDAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹5.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedvibrant construction awardedOthers

About vibrant construction

vibrant construction appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹14.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAJENDRA GUPTA, GURUKRIPA ENTERPRISES and SHASTRI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. RAJENDRA GUPTA bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; vibrant construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.