Competitor profile

VIBEILIETUO KETS

They win 33% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Mar 2012last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹18.9 Cr
of ₹45.0 Cr bid — 42.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost466.7%
By value₹45.0 Cr
42.1%
57.9%
Awarded₹18.9 Cr42.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹26.0 Cr57.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Nagaland CE-PMGSY₹18.9 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Akato Zhimomi Y0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
PUKHATO SHOHE1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹10.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Angtokneangba Konyak1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
atoka awomi1 win · 1 shared tender
₹8.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
solomon lotha0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
K Asangla Jamir0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVIBEILIETUO awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to VIBEILIETUO

About VIBEILIETUO KETS

VIBEILIETUO KETS appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹18.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Mar 2012.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagaland CE-PMGSY, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Akato Zhimomi Y, PUKHATO SHOHE and Angtokneangba Konyak. Akato Zhimomi Y bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; VIBEILIETUO KETS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.