Competitor profile

Varghese.K.T

They win 55% of what they bid, and 51% of the value they chase.

42tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
42
42 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
23
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.7 Cr
of ₹11.1 Cr bid — 51.3% conversion
Win rate
54.8%
of 42 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count42 bids
54.8%
42.9%
Awarded2354.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.4%
Lost1842.9%
By value₹11.1 Cr
51.3%
48.3%
Awarded₹5.7 Cr51.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.7 L0.4%
Lost₹5.3 Cr48.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹5.4 Cr94.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹5.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
k v john6 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Subilesh KM0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ALMANAC ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY LLP0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MOHAMMED KAYANIKKARA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹52.9 L
won head-to-head
05
Pratheesh george1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹49.4 L
won head-to-head
06
ARDEN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹14.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVarghese.K.T awardedOthers

About Varghese.K.T

Varghese.K.T appears as a bidder on 42 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 42 decided bids, it was awarded 23 — a 54.8% win rate — worth ₹5.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 94.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against k v john, Subilesh KM and ALMANAC ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY LLP. k v john bid on 27 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; Varghese.K.T won 18.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.