Competitor profile

VARDMAN ENTERPRISES

They win 11% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

48tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
17 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
46
48 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
37 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹15.4 Cr bid — 10.2% conversion
Win rate
10.9%
of 46 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count46 bids
10.9%
80.4%
Awarded510.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected48.7%
Lost3780.4%
By value₹15.4 Cr
10.1%
81.7%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr10.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 Cr8.1%
Lost₹12.6 Cr81.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
3Krishna Enterprises1 win · 26 shared tenders
₹33.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Balaji Associates2 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹61.5 L
won head-to-head
03
Shiva Enterprises1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹38.7 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Kok Singh Sisodia1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹16.5 L
won head-to-head
05
SahaDevSingh Constructions1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹27.8 L
won head-to-head
06
N.K. ENTERPRISES1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹28.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVARDMAN ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About VARDMAN ENTERPRISES

VARDMAN ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 48 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 46 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 10.9% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 16.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against 3Krishna Enterprises, Balaji Associates and Shiva Enterprises. 3Krishna Enterprises bid on 26 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; VARDMAN ENTERPRISES won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.