Competitor profile

UTTAM NAG

They win 37% of what they bid — and 51% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

115tenders on record
12buyer authorities
1state
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
115
115 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
42
53 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.0 Cr
of ₹43.3 Cr bid — 50.7% conversion
Win rate
36.5%
of 115 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count115 bids
36.5%
17.4%
46.1%
Awarded4236.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2017.4%
Lost5346.1%
By value₹43.3 Cr
50.7%
14.0%
35.3%
Awarded₹22.0 Cr50.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.1 Cr14.0%
Lost₹15.3 Cr35.3%

Where they win

7 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Chairman cum MD, TSECL₹19.3 Cr88.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹22.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ADHIR DEBNATH7 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹3.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RATAN PAUL4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
BISWAJIT SAHA5 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹98.7 L
won head-to-head
04
BIDESH CHANDRA PAUL0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ruma Rudra Paul0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SAMPA SARMA BANIK1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹52,461
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUTTAM NAG awardedOthers

About UTTAM NAG

UTTAM NAG appears as a bidder on 115 government tenders on record, from 12 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 115 decided bids, it was awarded 42 — a 36.5% win rate — worth ₹22.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chairman cum MD, TSECL, at 88.0% of what it has won, out of 7 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ADHIR DEBNATH, RATAN PAUL and BISWAJIT SAHA. ADHIR DEBNATH bid on 18 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; UTTAM NAG won 10.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.