Competitor profile

UTKAL NATH

They win 5% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

60tenders on record
9buyer authorities
1state
8 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
60
60 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
54 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.2 Cr
of ₹81.5 Cr bid — 5.1% conversion
Win rate
5.0%
of 60 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count60 bids
90.0%
Awarded35.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected35.0%
Lost5490.0%
By value₹81.5 Cr
88.9%
Awarded₹4.2 Cr5.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.9 Cr6.0%
Lost₹72.4 Cr88.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹4.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Subash Chandra Patra2 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PRUTHI RANJAN NAYAK0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
NIRANJAN DAS0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SUNIL KUMAR MOHAPATRA1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
BISWAJIT ROUT1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUTKAL NATH awardedOthers

About UTKAL NATH

UTKAL NATH appears as a bidder on 60 government tenders on record, from 9 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 60 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 5.0% win rate — worth ₹4.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Odisha State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd, at 53.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Subash Chandra Patra, ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA and PRUTHI RANJAN NAYAK. Subash Chandra Patra bid on 26 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; UTKAL NATH won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.