Competitor profile

UMESH SINGH-M/s U and M Enterprises

They win 23% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2015last award
Total bids
13
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.2 Cr
of ₹50.1 Cr bid — 28.4% conversion
Win rate
23.1%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
23.1%
15.4%
61.5%
Awarded323.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected215.4%
Lost861.5%
By value₹50.1 Cr
28.4%
12.7%
58.9%
Awarded₹14.2 Cr28.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.4 Cr12.7%
Lost₹29.5 Cr58.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD Special Division₹14.2 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹14.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MANOJ KUMAR SINGH3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹5.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
₹12.7 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹5.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SUBHAS CHOUDHARY1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
KESHAV KUMAR NARSARIYA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUMESH SINGH-M/s awardedOthers

About UMESH SINGH-M/s U and M Enterprises

UMESH SINGH-M/s U and M Enterprises appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 23.1% win rate — worth ₹14.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2015.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RDD Special Division, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PUNIT KUMAR AGARWAL-RAJBIR CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., MANOJ KUMAR SINGH and Avtar Singh-M/s Hardev Construction Pvt. Ltd.. PUNIT KUMAR AGARWAL-RAJBIR CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; UMESH SINGH-M/s U and M Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.