Competitor profile

UMA KANTA NAYAK

They win 3% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

39tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
3 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
39
39 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
36 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹25.0 L
of ₹3.4 Cr bid — 7.4% conversion
Win rate
2.6%
of 39 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count39 bids
92.3%
Awarded12.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected25.1%
Lost3692.3%
By value₹3.4 Cr
83.3%
Awarded₹25.0 L7.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹31.8 L9.4%
Lost₹2.8 Cr83.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹25.0 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹25.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ram Prasad Sahu9 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹54.6 L
won head-to-head
02
KALYANI KUMARI NAYAK2 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
03
SANJAYA KUMAR MOHANTY0 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
CH MOHAN PRASAD SUBUDHI1 win · 24 shared tenders
₹1.9 L
won head-to-head
05
AJAYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA0 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Prabir Nayak3 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹9.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUMA KANTA NAYAK awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to UMA KANTA NAYAK

About UMA KANTA NAYAK

UMA KANTA NAYAK appears as a bidder on 39 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 39 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 2.6% win rate — worth ₹25.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Ram Prasad Sahu, KALYANI KUMARI NAYAK and SANJAYA KUMAR MOHANTY. Ram Prasad Sahu bid on 38 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; UMA KANTA NAYAK won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.