Competitor profile

M/S TUFAIL AHMAD MIR

They win 29% of what they bid — and 78% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
18 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.3 Cr
of ₹6.8 Cr bid — 78.3% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
28.6%
57.1%
14.3%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected457.1%
Lost114.3%
By value₹6.8 Cr
78.3%
17.9%
Awarded₹5.3 Cr78.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹25.9 L3.8%
Lost₹1.2 Cr17.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

HAUDD₹2.8 Cr53.6%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NASEER AHMAD LONE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL ZARGAR1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹4.1 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S ABDUL GANI GANAIE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.8 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S GOUSIA ROAD CONSTRUCTION CO.0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PEER MOHD SHAFI SHAH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S GULLA BHAT0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTUFAIL AHMAD awardedOthers

About M/S TUFAIL AHMAD MIR

M/S TUFAIL AHMAD MIR appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹5.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is HAUDD, at 53.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against NASEER AHMAD LONE, MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL ZARGAR and M/S ABDUL GANI GANAIE. NASEER AHMAD LONE bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S TUFAIL AHMAD MIR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.