Competitor profile

TRIPTI AGENCY

They win 19% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

16tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
11 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.2 L
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 8.1% conversion
Win rate
18.8%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
18.8%
56.3%
25.0%
Awarded318.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected956.3%
Lost425.0%
By value₹2.0 Cr
73.5%
18.5%
Awarded₹16.2 L8.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr73.5%
Lost₹37.1 L18.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹16.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Gupta Computers2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹26.3 L
won head-to-head
02
BIRLA COMPUTERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s. Kamla Enterprises1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹6.6 L
won head-to-head
04
ALLIANCE INFONET SOLUTIONS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹9.7 L
won head-to-head
05
Aditya Solutions0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Bharat Creations2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹36.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTRIPTI AGENCY awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to TRIPTI AGENCY

About TRIPTI AGENCY

TRIPTI AGENCY appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 18.8% win rate — worth ₹16.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of College Education, at 81.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Gupta Computers, BIRLA COMPUTERS and M/s. Kamla Enterprises. Gupta Computers bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; TRIPTI AGENCY won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.