Competitor profile

Triofab India Private Limited

They won all 2 of their bids with a result, worth ₹15.7 Cr.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
18 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.7 Cr
of ₹15.7 Cr bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
100.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
100.0%
Awarded2100.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹15.7 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹15.7 Cr100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹43.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
GMM PFAUDLER LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
GEMINI ENGI-FAB LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Hemalathaa Hitech Industries0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Isgec Hitachi Zosen Ltd0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTriofab India awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Triofab India

About Triofab India Private Limited

Triofab India Private Limited appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 100.0% win rate — worth ₹15.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Numaligarh Refinery Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against TECHNO PROCESS EQUIPMENTS INDIA PVT LTD, GMM PFAUDLER LTD and GEMINI ENGI-FAB LIMITED. TECHNO PROCESS EQUIPMENTS INDIA PVT LTD bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Triofab India Private Limited won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.