Competitor profile

Trimurti constructions

They win 26% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

35tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
10 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
35
35 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
20 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹34.6 Cr
of ₹155.6 Cr bid — 22.2% conversion
Win rate
25.7%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
25.7%
17.1%
57.1%
Awarded925.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected617.1%
Lost2057.1%
By value₹155.6 Cr
22.2%
13.1%
64.7%
Awarded₹34.6 Cr22.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹20.4 Cr13.1%
Lost₹100.6 Cr64.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-MRRDA₹34.6 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
S H CHAKOLE3 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹6.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ANKIT FATEHSINGH CHOUHAN0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MUKESH CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹10.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
MS MS WALIA AND BROS GONDIA1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹21.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
m/s uday kumar pramar5 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹16.8 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S IDEAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTrimurti constructions awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Trimurti constructions

About Trimurti constructions

Trimurti constructions appears as a bidder on 35 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 25.7% win rate — worth ₹34.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-MRRDA, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against S H CHAKOLE, ANKIT FATEHSINGH CHOUHAN and MUKESH CONSTRUCTION. S H CHAKOLE bid on 21 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Trimurti constructions won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.