Competitor profile

TORQUE POWER TRANSMISSION

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
22 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8,716
of ₹4.2 L bid — 2.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹4.2 L
97.9%
Awarded₹8,7162.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.1 L97.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMIT RAWAT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
DADDAJI ADVERTISERS AND MARKETING1 win · 1 shared tender
₹14,501
won head-to-head
03
SUNEEL KUMAR BASOR1 win · 1 shared tender
₹9,472
won head-to-head
04
SAGAR CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SANJAY RAI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
AKHLESH KUMAR JAIN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTORQUE POWER awardedOthers

About TORQUE POWER TRANSMISSION

TORQUE POWER TRANSMISSION appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹8,716 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AMIT RAWAT, DADDAJI ADVERTISERS AND MARKETING and SUNEEL KUMAR BASOR. AMIT RAWAT bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; TORQUE POWER TRANSMISSION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.