Competitor profile

M/S TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION

They win 30% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

20tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
20
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹10.8 Cr bid — 33.6% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 20 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count20 bids
30.0%
20.0%
50.0%
Awarded630.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected420.0%
Lost1050.0%
By value₹10.8 Cr
33.7%
17.2%
49.1%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr33.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr17.2%
Lost₹5.3 Cr49.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S MA AMBE CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹76.6 L
won head-to-head
03
SHIV TRADERS3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
ANIL ELECTRICALS AND CONTRACTORS1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹25.8 L
won head-to-head
05
UMESH KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAJESH SHARMA0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION

M/S TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 20 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Indian Institute of Technology(ISM) Dhanbad, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S MA AMBE CONSTRUCTION, M/S JAI MATA DI SHIKSHIT BEROJGAR SWAWLAMBI SAHAKARI SAMITI LIMITED and SHIV TRADERS. M/S MA AMBE CONSTRUCTION bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.