Competitor profile

THOMAS M MATTACKAL

They win 17% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹20.4 L
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 10.6% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹1.9 Cr
10.6%
89.4%
Awarded₹20.4 L10.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.7 Cr89.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Venus Engineering1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹26.8 L
won head-to-head
02
Hari Construction1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹42.1 L
won head-to-head
03
Krishna Engineering1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹26.7 L
won head-to-head
04
AARTI ENTERPRISES1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹28.4 L
won head-to-head
05
NILESH SUBHASH KARALE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Laxmi Enterprise1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹26.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTHOMAS M MATTACKAL awardedOthers

About THOMAS M MATTACKAL

THOMAS M MATTACKAL appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹20.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Venus Engineering, Hari Construction and Krishna Engineering. Venus Engineering bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; THOMAS M MATTACKAL won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.