Competitor profile

Thirumalai Enterprises

They win 56% of what they bid, but only 35% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 34.9% conversion
Win rate
55.6%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
55.6%
44.4%
Awarded555.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost444.4%
By value₹3.1 Cr
34.9%
65.1%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr34.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.0 Cr65.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAM ELECTRICALS2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹49.6 L
won head-to-head
02
SENTHIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s. CHANDRA REDDY ELECTRICALS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SRI DURGA ENTERPRISES2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹38.8 L
won head-to-head
05
ELECTRICAL INDIA2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹41.0 L
won head-to-head
06
POWER TECH ENTEPRISES2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹38.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedThirumalai awardedOthers

About Thirumalai Enterprises

Thirumalai Enterprises appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 55.6% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Armoured Vehicles Nigam Limited, at 67.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAM ELECTRICALS, SENTHIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS and M/s. CHANDRA REDDY ELECTRICALS. RAM ELECTRICALS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Thirumalai Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.