Competitor profile

Technocraft Infrastructure

They win 33% of what they bid — and 68% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
3 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹19.0 Cr
of ₹28.1 Cr bid — 67.7% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹28.1 Cr
67.7%
32.3%
Awarded₹19.0 Cr67.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹9.1 Cr32.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Directorate Urban Administration and Development₹19.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹19.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHUBHAAKRITI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
KAILA DEVI INFRA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PATIRAJ SINGH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
B S A CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MS RSONS INFRA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M S BUILDCON0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTechnocraft awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Technocraft

About Technocraft Infrastructure

Technocraft Infrastructure appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹19.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHUBHAAKRITI, KAILA DEVI INFRA and PATIRAJ SINGH. SHUBHAAKRITI bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Technocraft Infrastructure won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.