Competitor profile

TECHNO AQUA TECH PVT. LTD.

They win 14% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
5buyer authorities
0states
1 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹35.2 L
of ₹5.6 Cr bid — 6.3% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
57.1%
28.6%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected457.1%
Lost228.6%
By value₹5.6 Cr
74.0%
19.7%
Awarded₹35.2 L6.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.1 Cr74.0%
Lost₹1.1 Cr19.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ACE DYNAMICS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹21.3 L
won head-to-head
02
lakshmi constructions0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s UMAMANI CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
S V ENVIRO LABS AND CONSULTANTS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Dhruba Charan Behera0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
THE ANDHRA SUGARS LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTECHNO AQUA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to TECHNO AQUA

About TECHNO AQUA TECH PVT. LTD.

TECHNO AQUA TECH PVT. LTD. appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹35.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ACE DYNAMICS, lakshmi constructions and M/s UMAMANI CONSTRUCTIONS. ACE DYNAMICS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; TECHNO AQUA TECH PVT. LTD. won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.