Competitor profile

TAPAS KUMAR PANDA

They win 8% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

51tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
1 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
51
51 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.3 Cr
of ₹21.1 Cr bid — 15.8% conversion
Win rate
7.8%
of 51 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count51 bids
17.6%
74.5%
Awarded47.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected917.6%
Lost3874.5%
By value₹21.1 Cr
15.8%
75.2%
Awarded₹3.3 Cr15.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr9.0%
Lost₹15.9 Cr75.2%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹1.5 Cr45.5%
EIC-CIVIL₹68.8 L20.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹3.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GIRIJA SHANKAR PANDA0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
CHHEDILAL KATARUKA0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
BIDHUBHUSAN PARIDA0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
AMIT KUMAR MAHAPATRA1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹25.4 L
won head-to-head
05
BRAHMANANDA SAHOO0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SANDEEP SARAN BEHERA0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTAPAS KUMAR awardedOthers

About TAPAS KUMAR PANDA

TAPAS KUMAR PANDA appears as a bidder on 51 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 51 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 7.8% win rate — worth ₹3.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 45.5% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against GIRIJA SHANKAR PANDA, CHHEDILAL KATARUKA and BIDHUBHUSAN PARIDA. GIRIJA SHANKAR PANDA bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; TAPAS KUMAR PANDA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.