Competitor profile

SYNERGY SHIPPING PVT LTD

They win 57% of what they bid, but only 9% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.1 Cr
of ₹46.0 Cr bid — 8.9% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
57.1%
28.6%
14.3%
Awarded457.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected228.6%
Lost114.3%
By value₹46.0 Cr
88.1%
Awarded₹4.1 Cr8.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹40.5 Cr88.1%
Lost₹1.4 Cr3.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
INTEGRAL TRADING AND LOGISTICS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s. Gateway East India Private Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
05
₹4.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
VISHALA TRANSPORT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSYNERGY SHIPPING awardedOthers

About SYNERGY SHIPPING PVT LTD

SYNERGY SHIPPING PVT LTD appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹4.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Aluminium Company Limited,NALCO, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against INTEGRAL TRADING AND LOGISTICS, MEGASEA SHIPPING & LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED and M/s. Gateway East India Private Limited. INTEGRAL TRADING AND LOGISTICS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SYNERGY SHIPPING PVT LTD won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.