Competitor profile

M/s Sweeta Construction

They win 14% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

35tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
21 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
35
35 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹66.6 L
of ₹10.8 Cr bid — 6.2% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
14.3%
60.0%
25.7%
Awarded514.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2160.0%
Lost925.7%
By value₹10.8 Cr
62.5%
31.3%
Awarded₹66.6 L6.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.8 Cr62.5%
Lost₹3.4 Cr31.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

NREP Sahibganj₹66.6 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹66.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAM LAL0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S MANOJ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S MUNNI DEVI0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHIV VINAY PANDEY0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAVI RAKSHIT0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MANOJ KUMAR SAHA1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹25.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSweeta Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Sweeta Construction

M/s Sweeta Construction appears as a bidder on 35 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹66.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NREP Sahibganj, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAM LAL, M/S MANOJ CONSTRUCTION and M/S MUNNI DEVI. RAM LAL bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Sweeta Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.