Competitor profile

M/S Swarn Constructions

They win 22% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

69tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
17 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
69
69 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
54 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 Cr
of ₹16.8 Cr bid — 16.6% conversion
Win rate
21.7%
of 69 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count69 bids
21.7%
78.3%
Awarded1521.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost5478.3%
By value₹16.8 Cr
16.6%
83.4%
Awarded₹2.8 Cr16.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹14.0 Cr83.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

15 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ms triveni nirman5 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S BHAWANI CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹74.2 L
won head-to-head
03
MS NANDAN SINGH FARSWAN2 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹44.4 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S RAMESH LAL1 win · 23 shared tenders
₹23.9 L
won head-to-head
05
Ganesh Dimri Construction2 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹73.1 L
won head-to-head
06
MS Construction & Suppliers4 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSwarn Constructions awardedOthers

About M/S Swarn Constructions

M/S Swarn Constructions appears as a bidder on 69 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 69 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 21.7% win rate — worth ₹2.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ms triveni nirman, M/S BHAWANI CONSTRUCTION and MS NANDAN SINGH FARSWAN. ms triveni nirman bid on 30 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; M/S Swarn Constructions won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.