Competitor profile

SUSHANT NAYAK

They win 6% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

88tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
88
88 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
71 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹27.4 L
of ₹7.5 Cr bid — 3.7% conversion
Win rate
5.7%
of 88 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count88 bids
13.6%
80.7%
Awarded55.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1213.6%
Lost7180.7%
By value₹7.5 Cr
17.7%
78.6%
Awarded₹27.4 L3.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 Cr17.7%
Lost₹5.9 Cr78.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹16.7 L60.7%
CE-BM,LMB Basin,BBSR₹10.8 L39.3%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹27.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Rajesh Kumar Das0 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MIR MOHAMMED OBEDUR RAHEMAN1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹4.2 L
won head-to-head
03
MIR AETSAM UL HAQ0 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JAGABANDHU MOHANTY2 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹19.9 L
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Pradyumna Kishor Rout2 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹6.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUSHANT NAYAK awardedOthers

About SUSHANT NAYAK

SUSHANT NAYAK appears as a bidder on 88 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 88 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 5.7% win rate — worth ₹27.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 60.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Rajesh Kumar Das, MIR MOHAMMED OBEDUR RAHEMAN and MIR AETSAM UL HAQ. Rajesh Kumar Das bid on 33 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SUSHANT NAYAK won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.