Competitor profile

Suresh Provision and General Store

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
16 Dec 2022last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2
of ₹9.2 L bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹9.2 L
100.0%
Awarded₹20.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.2 L100.0%
Lost₹10.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Agarwal General Store3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3
won head-to-head
02
AMI LAL SATYA BHAGWAN1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
03
AAR ESS HOSPITALITY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
GUPTA STORES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1
won head-to-head
05
RAJ KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
GIAN SINGH AND ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSuresh Provision awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Suresh Provision

About Suresh Provision and General Store

Suresh Provision and General Store appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹2 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Dec 2022.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Agarwal General Store, AMI LAL SATYA BHAGWAN and AAR ESS HOSPITALITY. Agarwal General Store bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Suresh Provision and General Store won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.