Competitor profile

M/S SURENDER KUMAR

They win 30% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
7 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹51.3 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 35.3% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
30.0%
70.0%
Awarded330.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost770.0%
By value₹1.5 Cr
35.3%
64.7%
Awarded₹51.3 L35.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹94.0 L64.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

UDD Secretary₹23.0 L44.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹51.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S AMRENDER VERMA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹13.1 L
won head-to-head
02
MS NEHA ENTERPRISES1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹12.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S CHANDRAMANI ENTERPRISES2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹20.1 L
won head-to-head
04
YZ ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAJEEV RANJAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SAMLESHWARI CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹12.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSURENDER KUMAR awardedOthers

About M/S SURENDER KUMAR

M/S SURENDER KUMAR appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹51.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zila Parishad Hazaribagh, at 55.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S AMRENDER VERMA, MS NEHA ENTERPRISES and M/S CHANDRAMANI ENTERPRISES. M/S AMRENDER VERMA bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S SURENDER KUMAR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.