Competitor profile

M/s Surbhi Construction

They win 42% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

192tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
24 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
191
192 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
81
106 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹28.2 Cr
of ₹75.6 Cr bid — 37.3% conversion
Win rate
42.4%
of 191 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count191 bids
42.4%
55.5%
Awarded8142.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected42.1%
Lost10655.5%
By value₹75.6 Cr
37.3%
60.8%
Awarded₹28.2 Cr37.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr2.0%
Lost₹45.9 Cr60.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

81 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Surbhi Sales Corporation26 wins · 47 shared tenders
₹5.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Anaya Constructions4 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹81.0 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s Surbhi Infrastructures1 win · 19 shared tenders
₹21.3 L
won head-to-head
04
BALAJI & ASSOCIATES1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹1.9 L
won head-to-head
05
YogeshEnterprises0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
R.S.Sirsiya Construction Co.5 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSurbhi Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Surbhi Construction

M/s Surbhi Construction appears as a bidder on 192 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 191 decided bids, it was awarded 81 — a 42.4% win rate — worth ₹28.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation of Delhi, at 77.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Surbhi Sales Corporation, M/s Anaya Constructions and M/s Surbhi Infrastructures. M/s Surbhi Sales Corporation bid on 47 of the same tenders and won 26 of them; M/s Surbhi Construction won 17.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.