Competitor profile

SURAJMAL MITTAL

They win 67% of what they bid, and 76% of the value they chase.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
24 Feb 2018last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 75.6% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost133.3%
By value₹2.0 Cr
75.6%
24.4%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr75.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹50.0 L24.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹1.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HARISH KUMAR GUPTA1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹80.0 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S DEEPAK KUMAR ERAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
vinod kumar yadav0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Naresh kumar contractor0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Jallan Transport Company0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PAWANSUT ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSURAJMAL MITTAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SURAJMAL MITTAL

About SURAJMAL MITTAL

SURAJMAL MITTAL appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Feb 2018.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rajasthan State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against HARISH KUMAR GUPTA, M/S DEEPAK KUMAR ERAN and vinod kumar yadav. HARISH KUMAR GUPTA bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SURAJMAL MITTAL won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.