Competitor profile

SURABHI HOTELS CATERING

They win 67% of what they bid — and 100% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹1.6 Cr bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost133.3%
By value₹1.6 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹100.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MAWS₹1.6 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Tamil Nadu₹1.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
GRAMADHANA NIRMANA SANGAM0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
GANESAN TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KING CATERING0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
No Food Waste0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
VISHNU TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSURABHI HOTELS awardedOthers

About SURABHI HOTELS CATERING

SURABHI HOTELS CATERING appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MAWS, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Tamil Nadu. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against KOTHARI INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED, GRAMADHANA NIRMANA SANGAM and GANESAN TRADERS. KOTHARI INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; SURABHI HOTELS CATERING won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.