Competitor profile

SUNILKUMAR

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹20.1 L
of ₹7.6 Cr bid — 2.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
33.3%
44.4%
22.2%
Awarded333.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected444.4%
Lost222.2%
By value₹7.6 Cr
63.8%
33.5%
Awarded₹20.1 L2.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.9 Cr63.8%
Lost₹2.6 Cr33.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹20.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A SURESH KUMAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹11.4 L
won head-to-head
02
S SAJEER1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M PRADEEPKUMAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
S RAJENDRAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ANOOP R0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHAJAN JACOB0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUNILKUMAR awardedOthers

About SUNILKUMAR

SUNILKUMAR appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹20.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 63.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against A SURESH KUMAR, S SAJEER and M PRADEEPKUMAR. A SURESH KUMAR bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SUNILKUMAR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.