Competitor profile

SUNIL M

They win 49% of what they bid, but only 30% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

37tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
37
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
18
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.2 Cr
of ₹10.7 Cr bid — 30.5% conversion
Win rate
48.6%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count37 bids
48.6%
21.6%
29.7%
Awarded1848.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected821.6%
Lost1129.7%
By value₹10.7 Cr
30.5%
17.3%
52.2%
Awarded₹3.2 Cr30.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr17.3%
Lost₹5.6 Cr52.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹2.9 Cr88.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹3.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹80.0 L
won head-to-head
02
ABDUL RAZIK1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹36.2 L
won head-to-head
03
MERP CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Jomon joseph0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
BAIJU V1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹24.0 L
won head-to-head
06
MATHEW ABRAHAM0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUNIL M awardedOthers

About SUNIL M

SUNIL M appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 18 — a 48.6% win rate — worth ₹3.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 88.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ONESQ BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, ABDUL RAZIK and MERP CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED. ONESQ BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; SUNIL M won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.