Competitor profile

M/S SUNIL KUMAR GAUR CONTRACTOR

They win 40% of what they bid, and 46% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2023last award
Total bids
10
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.6 Cr
of ₹23.1 Cr bid — 46.2% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
40.0%
20.0%
40.0%
Awarded440.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected220.0%
Lost440.0%
By value₹23.1 Cr
46.2%
23.0%
30.8%
Awarded₹10.6 Cr46.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.3 Cr23.0%
Lost₹7.1 Cr30.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹10.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS MAA SHANTI CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹6.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
DILSHAD AHMAD CONTRACTOR0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AWASTHI TUBEWELL COMPANY1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S V K CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s Mohd Umar Hashmi Contractor0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
shyam engineers0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUNIL KUMAR awardedOthers

About M/S SUNIL KUMAR GAUR CONTRACTOR

M/S SUNIL KUMAR GAUR CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹10.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CGM (Drinking Water) Jal Sansthan, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MS MAA SHANTI CONSTRUCTION, DILSHAD AHMAD CONTRACTOR and AWASTHI TUBEWELL COMPANY. MS MAA SHANTI CONSTRUCTION bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S SUNIL KUMAR GAUR CONTRACTOR won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.