Competitor profile

SUMIT KANTI MAJUMDER

They win 46% of what they bid, and 38% of the value they chase.

24tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
24
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.7 L
of ₹59.5 L bid — 38.1% conversion
Win rate
45.8%
of 24 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count24 bids
45.8%
54.2%
Awarded1145.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1354.2%
By value₹59.5 L
38.1%
61.9%
Awarded₹22.7 L38.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹36.8 L61.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹22.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MANOJ KUMAR ACHARYA3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹5.8 L
won head-to-head
02
ASHIS NATH0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
JIBAN MAJUMDER0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Xenon Power and Construction LLP0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
JIBAN KRISHNA LODH0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Tapas Nath1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUMIT KANTI awardedOthers

About SUMIT KANTI MAJUMDER

SUMIT KANTI MAJUMDER appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 24 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 45.8% win rate — worth ₹22.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, Rural Development Department, at 88.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MANOJ KUMAR ACHARYA, ASHIS NATH and JIBAN MAJUMDER. MANOJ KUMAR ACHARYA bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; SUMIT KANTI MAJUMDER won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.