Competitor profile

Suman Verma

They win 30% of what they bid, but only 19% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

40tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
12 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
40
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
25 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.8 Cr
of ₹9.2 Cr bid — 19.2% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 40 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count40 bids
30.0%
62.5%
Awarded1230.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected37.5%
Lost2562.5%
By value₹9.2 Cr
19.2%
72.1%
Awarded₹1.8 Cr19.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹80.0 L8.7%
Lost₹6.6 Cr72.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
shashikant2 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹12.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Pawan Kumar4 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹37.6 L
won head-to-head
03
PREM KRISHAN3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹29.2 L
won head-to-head
04
Ravinder Kumar0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Anil Jaswal1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹25.7 L
won head-to-head
06
Manoj Kumar0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSuman Verma awardedOthers

About Suman Verma

Suman Verma appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 40 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹1.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, at 79.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against shashikant, Pawan Kumar and PREM KRISHAN. shashikant bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Suman Verma won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.