Competitor profile

SUKRITI ENTERPRISES

They win 3% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

33tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
4 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
33
33 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
27 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹97.4 L
of ₹23.9 Cr bid — 4.1% conversion
Win rate
3.0%
of 33 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count33 bids
15.2%
81.8%
Awarded13.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected515.2%
Lost2781.8%
By value₹23.9 Cr
23.9%
72.0%
Awarded₹97.4 L4.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.7 Cr23.9%
Lost₹17.2 Cr72.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zila Parishad Ramgarh₹97.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹97.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SAMAR ENTERPRISES0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Rajesh Kumar Sharma0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MALTI CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S MATA VAISHNO DEVI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹53.4 L
won head-to-head
05
KARTIK KUMAR RAJAK1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹49.1 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S PAWAN BUILDER1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUKRITI ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About SUKRITI ENTERPRISES

SUKRITI ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 33 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 33 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 3.0% win rate — worth ₹97.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zila Parishad Ramgarh, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SAMAR ENTERPRISES, Rajesh Kumar Sharma and MALTI CONSTRUCTION. M/S SAMAR ENTERPRISES bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SUKRITI ENTERPRISES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.