Competitor profile

SUBRAT NAIK

They win 3% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹42.2 Cr bid — 3.7% conversion
Win rate
3.3%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
33.3%
63.3%
Awarded13.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1033.3%
Lost1963.3%
By value₹42.2 Cr
34.6%
61.7%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr3.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.6 Cr34.6%
Lost₹26.1 Cr61.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹1.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ANAND ENGINEERING3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹3.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
CHANDAN DUTTA0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ASHOK KUMAR SETHI5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹9.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
AJAYA KUMAR PATTNAIK0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
J J CONSTRUCTION1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
DEBARAJ LENKA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUBRAT NAIK awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SUBRAT NAIK

About SUBRAT NAIK

SUBRAT NAIK appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 3.3% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Orissa State Police Housing and Welfare Corporation Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ANAND ENGINEERING, CHANDAN DUTTA and ASHOK KUMAR SETHI. ANAND ENGINEERING bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; SUBRAT NAIK won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.