Competitor profile

SRI RAM CONSTRUCTION

They win 33% of what they bid — and 49% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

12tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
30 Sept 2025last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.3 Cr
of ₹33.3 Cr bid — 48.9% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count12 bids
33.3%
58.3%
Awarded433.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected18.3%
Lost758.3%
By value₹33.3 Cr
48.9%
41.7%
Awarded₹16.3 Cr48.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 Cr9.4%
Lost₹13.9 Cr41.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

WBSRDA₹8.5 Cr52.1%
SE- (RD),TN₹7.8 Cr47.9%

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vediappan.M3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹5.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M.Kumaresan1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
K.Sakthivel1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S GHOSH AND CO.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SIVA KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSRI RAM CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About SRI RAM CONSTRUCTION

SRI RAM CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹16.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is WBSRDA, at 52.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Vediappan.M, M.Kumaresan and K.Sakthivel. Vediappan.M bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; SRI RAM CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.