Competitor profile

Sri Nani Gopal Rupini

They win 37% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
28 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹3.9 Cr bid — 31.3% conversion
Win rate
36.7%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
36.7%
13.3%
50.0%
Awarded1136.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected413.3%
Lost1550.0%
By value₹3.9 Cr
31.2%
20.6%
48.2%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr31.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹81.0 L20.6%
Lost₹1.9 Cr48.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KANTA DEBBARMA4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹24.8 L
won head-to-head
02
BIJOY DEBBARMA1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹8.4 L
won head-to-head
03
Sri Subrata Debbarma1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹6.3 L
won head-to-head
04
INDIKA DEBBARMA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Samanta Dabbarma0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ANJAN DAS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSri Nani Gopal awardedOthers

About Sri Nani Gopal Rupini

Sri Nani Gopal Rupini appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 36.7% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, Rural Development Department, at 92.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KANTA DEBBARMA, BIJOY DEBBARMA and Sri Subrata Debbarma. KANTA DEBBARMA bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Sri Nani Gopal Rupini won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.